Isaiah 30 – Isaiah
speaks out against the efforts of those who are looking to Egypt to help them.
“Pharaoh’s protection will be your shame” (30:3). God instructs the prophet to
inscribe this oracle on a tablet so “in the time to come it may serve as a witness
for ever” (30:8). “Since you . . . prefer to trust in wile and guile . . . your
guilt will prove to be for you a breach on the point of collapse” (30:13). “Your salvation lay in conversion and
tranquility, your strength, in complete trust; and you would have none of it”
(30:15).
Yahweh assures them that He is “waiting to be gracious to
you, to rise and take pity on you, for Yahweh is a just God” (30:18).
Prosperity will come and the Lord will comfort you. “He will be gracious to you
when he hears your cry; when he hears he will answer. When the Lord has given
you the bread of suffering and the water of distress, he who is your teacher
will hide no longer, and you will see your teacher with your own eyes” (30:20).
You will hear his voice saying, “This is
the way, follow it” (30:21).
From Leadings: A Catholic’s Journey Through
Quakerism
Part 28
Skipping back a ways – I went over
all of the particular Quaker Testimonies I found appealing and had gotten to
the part where I felt called to return to the Catholic Church. Then I realized
I hadn’t explained why I had ever joined the church the first time in 1964. So
now I have gone over that and then why I fell away and what is was that drew me
to Quakers in the early 80s. I joined the Religious Society of Friends in 1982
and was an active Friend until the late around 1990. Then I felt myself called
back – not because I was disenchanted with Friends so much as that I thought I
need both.
First the
similarities I found in Catholicism and Quakerism: Both the Catholic church
and earthly Quakers believed that Christ
was and is really and completely present in his Church and among his people.
He promised us that he would be “with us always, even until the very end of
time” (Matt. 28:20), and he has kept his promise. For Friends, however, the
Christ we can know and be joined with is only Spirit; but for Catholics he is
also miraculously and mysteriously present in the sacramental dimension of the
Church’s existence—in the bread that is broken at Mass, in the priests who
break the bread, in the Holy Father who tends the sheep and encourages the
brethren, and in many other ways. I do not see why one necessarily excludes the
other. Perhaps I am just not an
“either/or” sort of person, but instead a “both/and” sort. This is the
richness of the Trinitarian God we worship. He is Creator God, Christ, and
Spirit, and each is an opening into the other, so there is no reason why he
should be present to us only inwardly or only in sacrament or only in and
through nature. He is in all of these. He is before us, beyond us, in us, in
our church, in the bread he breaks for us, in the love he manifests to us in
all these things. And when we join ourselves to him, we see him everywhere—in
all these things and others besides.
His gift of himself in our communion bread is a very
corporate presence; his gift of himself to us in our minds and hearts is very
individual and personal. The
relationship between inward and outward is infinitely complex—the outward
stimulating and shaping the inward, the inward recognizing and infusing the
outward with power far beyond what is there alone. If we were angels—beings
whose essential nature was not tied to the physical creation but were in some
way we cannot imagine purely spiritual—then perhaps the substance of the gospel
could be that spiritual, “unclothed” essence some modern Friends take it to be,
not bound up with time, history, concrete physical reality. But we are not
angels. Our essential nature is bound to
physicality, time, history, concrete, mediating forms that are our ways into
the world of spirit. When we try to pretend we are like angels, that we
don’t “need” outward things to mediate spiritual truth, we pull away from
truth, come unmoored from the forms through which we came to the measure of
truth were capable of possessing.
No comments:
Post a Comment